Driving Forward > Digital Marketing Blog

14 Social Media ROI Metrics You Can Use Right Now!

By

Companies are still grappling with how to measure social media and its resulting return on investment (ROI). The reality is that while there are new and unique metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) related to social, so much of what you do can be tracked just like anything else you do online.

The new social metrics include social connections like Facebook fans (or likes), Facebook engagement rates, social chatter, and Twitter retweet rates. Traditional metrics you can easily look at are things like impressions, clicks, site traffic, leads, revenue – all the things you look at now when you run banners or paid search or look at your site analytics.

So let’s explore some of these metrics and take a look at what it looks like to visualize this data. Data visualization and dashboarding graphics in this column are from Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, SocialEye, Radian6, and Bitly.

Social Media Metrics

Social connections. This is what most marketers dwell on when looking at social media. Basically it’s looking at Facebook fans and Twitter followers. However, in the long run, unless you are a brand that has the budget and potential to eventually gain hundreds of thousands or even millions of fans, it may be your least valuable metric.

connections

Social page views. This metric is just like page views to your site but instead it’s how many page views you got on your Facebook page. In some cases I would consider page views on your branded Facebook page more valuable than some page views on your site. I mean, a random page view on an obscure internal site page is often worthless, right? The chart below actually plots out daily level fans and daily page views.

page-views

Video/SlideShare views. Now this one is obvious – it’s how many views you got on your videos on YouTube or presentations on SlideShare. The chart below is plotting out daily levels of YouTube video views within a YouTube channel.

video-plays

Engagement rate. This one is super important. The metric from the graphic below is basically the total of likes and comments divided by a total fan count. A good social media marketer needs to know when she posts something that creates reaction and engagement. It lets you take note of what you posted and, as importantly, when. Having a high engagement rate will help to build your EdgeRank! Also, take note as to whether the reaction was positive – clearly a lot of negative responses, while building your EdgeRank, are not good! (EdgeRank is the Facebook algorithm that personalizes your newsfeed and inserts posts it thinks you will be interested in based on your relationship with the poster. Want to know more about EdgeRank? Just Google it.)

engagement-rate

Talking about this. This is like a buzz metric on Facebook. It reports on how many people are talking about you or your posts on their pages. For example, below is a snapshot from the Tabasco Facebook page – the “talking about this” number is boxed in red next to the fan count. Then the chart below that (not for Tabasco, by the way) is trending that number. It basically shows when you have things going on in the real, virtual, or social worlds that are sparking conversation on Facebook.

tabasco

talking

Facebook reach. This is a metric that Facebook generates that is based on your reach. The chart below is generated via tapping into the Facebook API and dividing it out by organic, viral, and paid. The key here is not to take it too literally. Like all online reach metrics, it is less about the accuracy of the numbers and more about scoring your previous performance. It is direction and allows you to ask, “Am I doing better than last week or last month and what did I do to improve or hurt my performance or reach?”

reach

Retweet rates. This is a super cool metric that helps you gage the relevance and appeal of your tweets by tracking how many people retweet it.

retweet

Twitter impression reach. This metric is the cumulative individual tweets going into people’s feeds based on all your tweets and retweets. Of course, this number does not represent all the people that saw your tweets – but it’s the sum total of your tweets’ possible impression and frequency. What’s more, the Twitter API can show you who is retweeting your posts and their reach. (Also see below.) So you can identify influencers who have a large base of followers and are likely to retweet you or post your content to their blog if they have one.

tweet-reach

tweet-reach-users

Social clicks. Are you using Bitly as a URL shortener? Well, you can use its API to see how many clicks you get and what category of posts drives the most clicks. This is important because if you’re being conversational you are very likely posting links that don’t always lead to your site – they may go to YouTube, Flickr, Pinterest, or blogs and media sites. So this is a good way to see how many clicks you are generating even if they are not to your site.

bitly-clicks

bitlyposts

Chatter levels. Want to know if all that posting, tweeting, blogging, public relations, and marketing is echoing in social media? Check out your chatter levels with applications like Radian6 or simple Google Alerts. While they are imperfect numbers like many online metrics, they do represent your overall presence and groundswell in the social media space.

chatter

Socially-referred site traffic. Just like search, banners, and email, you can see how much traffic your site gets from all the posting, tweeting, and groundswell a brand gets, not just in Facebook, but in all blogs, forums, and the millions of social media sites that could be talking about you and linking to you.

social-traffic

Socially-referred leads. Just like socially-referred traffic described above, you can see how many leads you get from social media. So you can track social media ROI and leads!

social-leads

Socially-referred revenue. Just like leads, e-commerce revenue can be sourced to social media. So you can track social media ROI for e-commerce too!

social-rev

Media equivalent value. Richard Fouts described “Media Equivalent Value” as “the monetary equivalent of the impressions generated through social media that would have traditionally been acquired through paid media.” Add up what you would pay for all the impressions, clicks, traffic and engagement, and leads you get from social and apply what you would pay for those clicks via banner buying or other forms of media buying in your category. By doing this you can arrive at your social program’s “Media Equivalent Value.”

media-value

ClickZ

Social Media: 15 Ways You’re Doing It Wrong

By

Facebook was founded in 2004, Twitter in 2006. Even Instagram’s been around for almost five years. So you can’t say this stuff is new anymore. For some strange reason, however, more marketers and brands than not are still struggling to make heads or tails of social media. Whether they’re surprisingly misinformed or just plain lost,…

Read the full article

Contact Us

Schedule a presentation, tell us about your marketing goals, find our offices or just to say hello. We would love to hear from you!

Contact Us   

Infographic

Search Marketing Map

Search-Marketing-Map-2016

Explore the evolving search marketing landscape.

Get Access!   

Infographic

Lead Gen Metrics Timeline

lead-gen-metrics-timeline-v2

The lead generation metrics that really matter.

Get Access!   

Infographic

Demand Gen Infrastructure

demandGen

Drive - Capture - Convert - Optimize: 4 Steps to ROI

Get Access!   

Archives

  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • September 2006
  • May 2006
  • September 2005